Can Army Make College Football Playoffs: Breaking Down Their Chances

Can Army Make College Football Playoffs: Breaking Down Their Chances

Can Army make the College Football Playoffs? No, Army cannot currently make the College Football Playoffs. As an FBS independent team, Army faces significant hurdles due to the playoff selection committee’s criteria, which heavily favor teams from Power Five conferences and those with demanding schedules. While Army football is a storied program with dedicated athletes, their independent status and typical strength of schedule make a direct playoff berth exceptionally difficult, if not impossible, under the current system.

However, to truly gauge Army’s potential, we need to delve deeper into the intricacies of college football, the playoff system, and what it would take for a team like the Army Black Knights to even be considered among the elite. This exploration will cover NCAA eligibility, college football rankings, the challenges faced by FBS independent teams, and how Army’s record, playoff chances, and bowl eligibility are intertwined.

Deciphering the Playoff Picture for Independents

The College Football Playoff (CFP) is the pinnacle of NCAA Division I Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS). It’s a four-team field determined by a selection committee that evaluates teams based on several key factors. For teams like Army, which operate outside the traditional conference structure, navigating these criteria presents a unique set of challenges.

The CFP Selection Committee’s Criteria

The CFP committee looks at a variety of metrics when selecting the playoff teams. These include:

  • Conference Championships: Winning a conference championship is a significant boost. Since Army is independent, they cannot win a conference championship, which automatically places them at a disadvantage.
  • Strength of Schedule: This is a crucial factor. Teams that play a tougher slate of opponents, especially against other highly ranked teams, are generally rewarded.
  • Head-to-Head Results: If teams have played each other, the committee considers who won.
  • Common Opponents: The committee may look at how teams performed against shared opponents.
  • Record: Overall wins and losses are important, but so is the quality of those wins and losses.
  • “Eye Test”: While not explicitly stated, the committee does consider how dominant a team looks on the field.
The Independent Hurdle

FBS independent teams, like Army, Notre Dame, and historically BYU, don’t have a conference championship game to play in. This eliminates a major pathway to an automatic bid or a strong conference championship signal to the committee. While Notre Dame has famously made the playoffs multiple times as an independent, they typically have a schedule that rivals any Power Five team and often plays several highly-ranked opponents.

For Army, the challenge is compounded. Their schedule, while often featuring some Power Five opponents, may not consistently present the gauntlet required to impress the committee on strength of schedule alone.

Army Football: A Look at the Black Knights’ Program

The Army Black Knights have a rich tradition in college football. Known for their disciplined approach, option offense, and a unique student-athlete experience, Army football has seen periods of significant success. Their players embody dedication and grit, attributes that are essential for competing at the highest level.

Historical Performance and Trends

Army has enjoyed national prominence at various points in its history, including periods of dominance in the mid-20th century. In more recent times, the program has worked to rebuild and achieve consistent winning seasons. Under coaches like Jeff Monken, Army has become a competitive force, particularly in their conference-affiliated games and against service academy rivals.

Strengths and Weaknesses of the Option Offense

Army’s signature triple-option offense presents a unique challenge for opponents. It relies on meticulous execution, ball control, and wearing down defenses.

  • Strengths:
    • Time of Possession: The option offense often controls the clock, limiting opponents’ possessions.
    • Physicality: It can be a physically demanding style of play for both Army and their opponents.
    • Unpredictability: For teams not accustomed to facing it, the option can be difficult to defend.
  • Weaknesses:
    • Reliance on Execution: If the option breaks down (fumbles, missed reads), it can lead to stalled drives or turnovers.
    • Defensive Adjustments: Modern defenses have become more adept at preparing for and containing the option.
    • Recruiting Challenges: Attracting top-tier talent that fits the specific needs of the option can be harder than recruiting for a pro-style offense.

Gauging Army’s Playoff Chances: A Realistic Assessment

Can Army make the College Football Playoffs? Based on the current structure and how the committee operates, the answer is a resounding no for a direct berth. However, let’s break down why and what hypothetical scenarios could even put them in the conversation.

Analyzing Army’s Record

Army’s record is crucial in determining their standing. Typically, to be considered for a playoff spot, a team needs to have a near-perfect or perfect record, especially if they aren’t winning a conference title. A 10-2 or 11-1 record would be a minimum benchmark.

  • Quality Wins: Against whom are those wins coming? A win over a highly-ranked opponent counts far more than a win over a struggling team.
  • Losses: Who did they lose to? A close loss on the road to a top-5 team is viewed differently than a blowout loss to an unranked team.
Strength of Schedule for Army

This is where the independent status truly bites. Army’s schedule often includes:

  • Service Academy Games: Navy and Air Force are tradition-rich programs, but they don’t consistently rank among the nation’s elite, nor do they play in Power Five conferences.
  • Conference Affiliation: Army plays a schedule that includes many games against teams from the Sun Belt, Conference USA, and other Group of Five conferences. While these conferences have produced competitive teams, their collective strength of schedule, as perceived by the CFP committee, doesn’t typically carry the same weight as the ACC, Big Ten, Big 12, Pac-12, or SEC.
  • “Money Games”: Army occasionally plays a marquee Power Five opponent. While these games are often challenging and can provide valuable experience, they are usually few and far between and not enough to significantly elevate their overall strength of schedule.
Bowl Eligibility: A More Attainable Goal

While playoff aspirations might be out of reach, bowl eligibility is a more realistic and important benchmark for Army football. Achieving bowl eligibility typically requires winning six or seven games. This allows the team to extend their season, gain more experience, and represent their program in a postseason bowl game.

Hypothetical Scenarios for Playoff Contention

For Army to even be considered for the College Football Playoffs, a seismic shift in the college football landscape or a truly unprecedented season would be required.

Scenario 1: A Dominant, Undefeated Season with Elite Wins
  • Perfect Record: Army would need to go undefeated, perhaps 12-0 or 13-0.
  • High-Profile Victories: They would need to schedule and defeat multiple highly-ranked Power Five opponents. This means actively seeking out top-25 teams and beating them decisively.
  • Impressive Statistics: Dominant margins of victory, elite defensive stats, and a highly efficient offense would be necessary.
Scenario 2: A Major Conference Realignment or Playoff Expansion
  • Joining a Conference: If Army were to join a Power Five conference, their path would become clearer, though still challenging. They would gain access to a conference championship game and a more consistently ranked schedule.
  • Playoff Expansion: If the playoff field were to expand significantly to include more at-large bids or automatically qualify conference champions from all divisions (including lower-ranked conferences), Army’s chances would improve.

The Role of College Football Rankings

College football rankings are subjective but highly influential. The CFP committee relies heavily on polls like the AP Top 25 and Coaches Poll, alongside their own internal evaluation.

  • Consistency: To break into the national rankings, Army would need to consistently defeat quality opponents and string together winning seasons.
  • Upsetting Ranked Teams: A key pathway to gaining national attention and improving rankings is by upsetting teams that are already ranked.
  • Narrative: A compelling storyline can also play a role. An undefeated independent team with a unique style of play could generate buzz, but without the resume of wins against top competition, it’s unlikely to be enough.

NCAA Eligibility and Academic Standards

It’s important to remember that NCAA eligibility for all student-athletes, including those at Army, is paramount. The rigorous academic demands at West Point mean that Army players are not only athletes but also future officers in the United States Army.

  • Academic Progress Rate (APR): Army, like all NCAA institutions, must maintain strong APR scores to remain eligible for championships and bowl games.
  • Student-Athlete Balance: The commitment to academics and military training adds another layer of complexity to the football program, highlighting the incredible dedication of the Army Black Knights.

Comparison with Other Independents: Notre Dame’s Path

Notre Dame, as the most successful FBS independent, provides a useful comparison.

  • Strength of Schedule: Notre Dame consistently plays a challenging schedule, often featuring multiple games against ACC opponents (as part of a scheduling agreement) and other highly-ranked teams.
  • Brand Recognition: The “Fighting Irish” brand carries immense weight and history, which may subtly influence perception.
  • Playoff Appearances: Notre Dame’s ability to reach the playoff as an independent demonstrates that it’s possible, but it requires an exceptional combination of winning, schedule strength, and consistent high performance.

Future Outlook for Army Football

The CFP system is likely to evolve. If the playoff expands or the criteria for selection are modified, the landscape for independents like Army could change. However, for the foreseeable future, making the playoff requires overcoming the inherent disadvantages of independence and the committee’s preference for conference champions from top leagues.

  • Focus on Continued Improvement: Army’s goal will remain to continue building a strong program, achieving winning seasons, and securing bowl eligibility.
  • Strategic Scheduling: The program may look for opportunities to schedule more challenging non-conference games that could bolster their resume.
  • The “What If”: While the playoff dream is distant, the dedication and spirit of Army football are undeniable. They represent a unique and inspiring part of college football.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Q1: Can Army football make the College Football Playoffs?
A1: No, under the current system, Army cannot make the College Football Playoffs. Their status as an FBS independent team and the typical strength of their schedule prevent them from meeting the selection committee’s primary criteria, such as winning a conference championship and playing a consistently elite slate of opponents.

Q2: What does Army need to do to even be considered for the playoffs?
A2: Army would need to have a perfect, undefeated season and schedule and defeat multiple highly-ranked Power Five opponents. They would also benefit from a general expansion of the playoff field or a significant shift in the committee’s evaluation criteria.

Q3: Why is being an FBS independent a disadvantage for playoff chances?
A3: Independent teams cannot win a conference championship, which is a significant factor for the CFP committee. They also often face challenges in building a consistently strong strength of schedule compared to teams in Power Five conferences.

Q4: What is a more realistic goal for Army football?
A4: A more realistic and achievable goal for Army football is bowl eligibility, which typically requires winning six or seven games in a season. Achieving bowl eligibility allows the team to extend their season and gain valuable postseason experience.

Q5: How does Army’s strength of schedule compare to Power Five teams?
A5: Army’s strength of schedule is generally considered weaker than that of Power Five conference teams. While they play some FBS opponents and occasionally a Power Five team, their schedule is often filled with games against teams from Group of Five conferences, which do not carry the same weight in playoff rankings.

Q6: Does NCAA eligibility affect Army’s football team differently?
A6: While all NCAA teams must adhere to eligibility rules, Army’s unique environment as a military academy means student-athletes must balance rigorous academic and military training alongside football. This requires exceptional discipline but doesn’t inherently prevent playoff contention; rather, it’s the scheduling and independent status that create the primary obstacles.

Leave a Comment